|
| Home | | About Us | | Water Planning | |
Groundwater | |
Conservation | |
Environmental Flows | |
Drought Mgmt. | |
Resources | |
Search | | ||
Economic Analysis and Water Planning Need for Ecomonic Analysis Improvement In December 2000, a group of noted resource economists from across the state gathered to discuss the use of economic analysis in the regional planning process. The economists noted in their report summarizing the conference that rule changes should be developed to incorporate "the use of appropriate economic principles in Senate Bill 1 Water Planning at the regional and state-wide levels." They also state that: The result of not incorporating valid economic theory into water resources planning assessments is that some projects may appear to be the best choice on the surface, but in reality may not be optimal once all the economic realities are considered. In fact, projects may actually not have benefits that exceed costs, but this cannot be determined without comprehensive benefit-cost analysis and use of discounting procedures. Without incorporation of these basic principles, it is hard to divine any meaning or significance of a project's being "in the region's plan." Because full economic analysis of all projects proposed in the regional plans has not been performed, we simply cannot say: 1) that any individual project produces benefits that are greater than its costs, or 2) that any project produces greater benefits than other projects (for the same amount of investment). Basic Economic Principles There are several economic principles essential to water planning. Failure to incorporate each of them on a consistent basis can lead to improper selection of water projects.
The Value of Water When water is treated as a marketable commodity, questions arise as to how to set its value. It is possible to tally up the going rate for an acre-foot of water, treatment costs, associated piping, etc. But treating water as a simple commodity like oil or livestock is too simplistic. It's value runs deeper and includes preserving our cultural heritage, the rural economy and way of life, and more tangible aspects such as maintaining soil moisture levels, springflow, and base-flows for rivers and streams. It is extremely difficult to quantify these values on the same scale as the price municipalities are willing to pay for water supplies. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||